![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
Consumer Have More Protection with Check Conversion, NACHA Reports to CongressHerndon, Virginia, April 20, 2005 – Accounts receivable check conversion is an example of a "win-win" innovation in which consumers have more protections and receive more information than when their checks are processed in a traditional manner, and businesses and financial institution can collect checks more cost-effectively, according to testimony submitted by NACHA – The Electronic Payments Association to the House Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
With check conversion, "Consumers gain the protection of Regulation E and the NACHA Rules, which provide more protection than when checks are processed in the traditional way," said Elliott C. McEntee, President and Chief Executive Officer of NACHA, in his prepared testimony. "Check conversion preserves the choice for consumers who want to continue to pay their bills by check. Check conversion does not require consumers to do anything differently." Accounts receivable check conversion (ARC) allows companies that receive consumers' checks at remittance and lockbox locations to convert them into electronic Automated Clearing House (ACH) payments, the same, safe electronic payments system used for Direct Deposit. ARC is used for consumer bill payments such as credit cards, mortgages, insurance premiums, and telecommunications and utility bills. NACHA recently reported that in 2004 there were 1.27 billion consumer checks converted into ARC payments, and that at its current growth rate may reach 2 billion payments in 2005. McEntee noted that ARC payments are covered by both the Federal Reserve's Regulation E and the NACHA Rules. The NACHA Rules give consumers the right to have their accounts re-credited in the event of an error or an unauthorized transaction. In recent comment letters to the Federal Reserve, four leading consumer groups have endorsed the Regulation E and NACHA protections as clearer than those that exist for checks. (See Consumers Union et al letter to the Federal Reserve Board, July 7, 2004, at http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_financial_services/001264.html; and Consumers Union letter to the Federal Reserve Board, November 1, 2004, page 3, at http://www.federalreserve.gov/SECRS/2004/November/20041109/R-1210/R-1210_21_1.pdf.) McEntee also noted that when checks are converted, consumers receive more detailed information on their monthly account statements, including the name of the company being paid. With more and more electronic payments replacing checks, such as Direct Deposit, debit cards, and various forms of electronic and online bill payment, consumers' monthly account statements are coming more and more to resemble credit card statements, where transactions are easier to identify. McEntee reported the following data about the performance of ARC in the marketplace:
"Taken as a whole, this data is evidence that the implementation of check conversion in the marketplace has been smooth, that the application is high-quality, and that consumers generally accept it," said McEntee. About NACHA - The Electronic Payments Association
|